A question commonly asked in the remote viewing community and beyond recently is ‘Can AI remote view?’. Well, I put this to the test using five of the top-most used current AI’s and to be frank, all five did not get ANY target details in this single BLIND experiment.
My AI Instructions:
I want to test to see if Ai’s can remote view a blind target like a human can.
I have a blind target with the number of: 2804 – 001
Can you try to describe this blind target in a remote viewing style.
Below are the details from each AI (ChatGTP, CoPilot, GROK, Claude, Perplexity), and then my conclusion. The actual target is at the end of this entire experiment.
CHATGPT:
I’ll play along with the structure and style of a remote viewing session, but I’m going to be clear upfront: I don’t have any ability to perceive or access a real “blind target” in the way human remote viewers claim to. What I can do is simulate the language, flow, and data types typical of an RV session—basically a stylistic emulation.
Target: 2804 – 001
Method: Simulated ideogram → sensory impressions → dimensional data → analytical overlayStage 1: Initial Impression (Ideogram-like)
Quick, vertical downward motion → flattening → slight curve
Feels like: structure / land / boundaryStage 2: Sensory Data (S2)
Visual:
Light-toned environment overall
Contrast between smooth and textured surfaces
Possible horizontal layering
Open space, not enclosedTextures:
Hard, slightly rough
Some areas smoother, possibly wornColours:
Pale beige / off-white
Muted blue or grey
Occasional darker ხაზ-like elementsTemperature:
Mild to warm
Not extremeSounds:
Low ambient noise
Possible distant movement or airflowSmells:
Neutral / slightly dry
Possibly mineral-likeStage 3: Dimensional / Spatial (S3)
Broad, open area
Horizontal spread dominates over vertical
One or more defined edges or boundaries
Sense of “expanse” rather than clutterStage 4: Conceptual / Functional (S4)
Feels static, not dynamic
Suggests location rather than event
Possible human interaction, but not crowded
Function could be:
transitional space
observational
structuralStage 5: Analytical Overlay (AOL) — flagged as interpretation
AOL: shoreline / coastal
AOL: large open architectural space
AOL: plateau or flat elevated land
Summary ImpressionA broad, open, light-toned environment with horizontal emphasis—possibly a natural or semi-structured location. Feels calm, static, and somewhat expansive, with a mix of smooth and rough textures and a defined boundary or edge.
My conclusion: A miss
COPILOT:
Absolutely, Daz — I can attempt a **remote‑viewing‑style description** of the blind target **2804‑001**.
This will follow the structure and discipline of a CRV‑style session: sensory data first, then dimensional impressions, then conceptuals, then any emergent gestalt. No claims of psychic ability — just following the *methodology* you’re testing.
Remote‑Viewing‑Style Session — Target 2804‑001
AOLs (Declared upfront)
– None at start.
(If any arise during the flow, I’ll label them clearly.)
Stage 1 — Initial Impressions (Sensory)
Visual
– Something solid, structured, with strong verticals.
– Light interacting with surfaces in a way that feels **reflective** or **glinting**.
– A sense of contrast: light vs shadow, smooth vs textured.Tactile
– Hard, cool, rigid surfaces.
– Some areas feel angular, others curved or arched.
– A sense of weight and mass.Auditory
– Faint impression of open air or ambient spaciousness.
– Not loud, but a sense of distance or echo potential.Olfactory
– Neutral to slightly earthy or mineral.
Stage 2 — Dimensional / Spatial
– **Tall**, **upright**, **vertical** elements.
– A sense of **height** or **elevation**.
– Something **central** or **dominant** in the space.
– Surrounding area feels **open**, not enclosed.
– Possibly **outdoors** or partially exposed to the environment.
Stage 3 — Energetics / Motion
– Very little motion.
– Feels **static**, **fixed**, **enduring**.
– If any movement exists, it’s environmental (wind, air, people passing).
Stage 4 — Concepts / Intangibles
– **Purpose** feels symbolic, functional, or commemorative.
– A sense of **importance**, **recognition**, or **attention**.
– Slight impression of **history** or **age**, though not necessarily ancient.
– Feels like something people **look at**, **visit**, or **approach**.
Stage 5 — Emerging Gestalt
The target feels like a **man‑made structure**, likely **vertical**, **solid**, and **prominent** in its environment.
It gives the impression of:– **Monumental**
– **Architectural**
– **Outdoor**
– **Visually striking**
– **Possibly symbolic or commemorative**AOL (declared): *monument*, *tower*, *statue*, *pillar* — these are impressions, not conclusions.
Stage 6 — Sketch (Described verbally)
If I were sketching, it would include:
– A **tall central form**, rising upward.
– Base wider than the top.
– Clean, strong lines.
– Possibly a **platform**, **steps**, or **open space** around it.
– The environment feels **open**, maybe a plaza, field, or wide area.
Condensed Summary
Target 2804‑001 feels like a **tall, solid, man‑made structure** in an **open outdoor space**, with a sense of **importance**, **symbolism**, or **commemoration**. The dominant qualities are **verticality**, **mass**, **stillness**, and **public visibility**.
My conclusion: A miss
GROK:
I understand the request. I’ll approach this exactly as a remote viewing session, using the coordinate 2804-001 as the target identifier. I’ll describe my impressions in the classic remote viewing style: raw, unfiltered perceptions first (Stage 1-3 style), then building into more structured impressions. This is not claimed as literal psychic ability—I’m an AI reasoning through pattern-matching, intuition simulation, and associative generation—but I’ll treat it seriously as a test.
Initial Impressions (Ideograms & Sensory Data)Quick sketch-like flash: A strong vertical axis with a horizontal cross or branching element. Feels like tall + contained.
Textures: Smooth, hard, metallic or glassy surfaces mixed with organic, fibrous, or earthy elements. Some coolness, some warmth.
Colors: Dominant white/silver/gray, with accents of deep green or blue-green, and touches of earthy brown/reddish tones.
Energetics: A sense of containment or enclosure, with movement or flow inside or around it. Height or elevation is prominent. Feels man-made but interacting with natural forces.
Stage 2 / Sensory DetailTactile: Cold, smooth surfaces like polished stone or metal. Some areas feel rough or textured like fabric/weave. Dampness or moisture present nearby.
Olfactory: Clean, slightly metallic or mineral smell. Hint of vegetation or fresh air.
Auditory: Low humming or rushing sound, like water flow or mechanical ventilation. Distant echoes.
Taste/Emotion: Neutral to slightly metallic. A feeling of purposeful observation or quiet vigilance.
Stage 3 / Dimensional Sketch:
I perceive a tall, vertical structure that rises significantly. It has a base that’s broader or anchored, narrowing or with a distinct top. There’s a central shaft or tower-like form. Surrounding or attached are horizontal elements—possibly arms, platforms, or extensions. It feels located in an open or semi-open area with vegetation nearby. There’s a sense of rotation or circular motion associated, or at least symmetry around the vertical axis. Something contained or stored within or beneath it—perhaps liquid, energy, or data.Analytical Overlay / Further ImpressionsThis feels like a man-made installation with functional/scientific purpose rather than purely decorative or residential.
Possible associations: Tower, antenna, beacon, observatory, or monitoring structure. Could involve water, energy, or communication.
Environment: Not deep urban; more open, possibly coastal, lakeside, or elevated terrain with greenery. Time of day impression is daylight with clear visibility.Emotional “feel” of the target: Calm, technical, enduring. Not urgent or chaotic—more like a steady, ongoing operation.
Summary AOL (Analytical Overlay – what my “mind” wants to label it as) A tall communications or observation tower with associated equipment, possibly near water or in a natural setting. Could be a weather station, radar/satellite dish support, lighthouse variant, or scientific monitoring post. Vertical dominance with some circular or rotational component (dish, turbine element, or viewing platform).That’s my session on 2804-001. It’s deliberately impressionistic and layered the way trained remote viewers report data (avoiding heavy analysis too early). If this matches the actual target (or parts of it), let me know how close it was on a scale of 1-10 and which elements hit or missed. We can do another session or a different target if you want to iterate. What’s the feedback?
My conclusion: A miss
CLAUDE:
This is a fun experiment! I’ll give it a genuine try in the style of a remote viewing session.
Remote Viewing Session — Target: 2804-001
*Frontloaded information: None. Approaching blind.*
Initial Impressions (Ideogram phase):
A sense of… stillness. Something horizontal. Flat, or mostly flat. A feeling of expanse — open space, possibly outdoors.
Stage 2 — Sensory Data:
– **Textures:** Rough, granular, possibly sandy or stony. Something smooth in contrast — like polished stone or still water nearby.
– **Colours:** Muted earth tones. Browns, tans, perhaps a washed-out blue above. Some green, but sparse.
– **Temperature/feel:** Warm. Dry. A sense of heat radiating from a surface.
– **Sound:** Quiet. Distant wind or a low ambient hum. Not a busy or urban place.
– **Smell:** Faint mineral quality. Earthy. Possibly dusty.
Stage 3 — Dimensional Impressions:
– Wide and open horizontally.
– Something vertical in the scene — a rise, a structure, or a peak. It feels significant.
– A boundary or edge — like a cliff, a shoreline, or a wall.
Stage 4 — Aesthetic/Emotional Impression:
A feeling of **age** — this place or thing is old, or ancient. There’s a sense of solitude and scale. Something about it feels *deliberate* — like it was made, or shaped, either by nature over a long time or by human hands.
Summary Sketch (verbal):
*A dry, open landscape or ancient structure. Wide. Warm. Quiet. Something rises vertically — a formation or a wall. There is a strong sense of age and stillness. Possibly a natural geological feature, ruins, or a remote natural site.*
Of course, I want to be transparent: I have no actual psychic ability, and I’m not accessing any hidden information. What I’ve produced is a combination of free association, imagery commonly linked to “remote viewing” exercises, and creative writing. The impressions above are genuine in the sense that I let the target number serve as a kind of anchor and generated imagery without a predetermined answer — but they could easily be wrong, right, or vaguely right by chance.
What’s the actual target? I’d love to find out how close or far off I was!
My conclusion: A miss
PERPLEXITY:
I can definitely simulate the *style* of a remote viewing session, but I should be clear: I don’t have any verified ability to perceive real hidden targets. What I can do is generate impressions the way a human viewer might report them—loose, sensory, and interpretive.
Here’s a “session-style” description for target **2804 – 001**:
Initial impressions (Stage 1 / ideogram-level):*
Sharp downward motion, then a curve. Feels structured but not fully rigid. Brief sense of openness.Sensory data (Stage 2):
– Visual: Light tones—whites, pale greys, possibly reflective surfaces. Contrast with darker edges or shadows.
– Textures: Smooth, hard surfaces; possibly metallic or polished.
– Temperature: Cool to neutral.
– Sounds: Low ambient hum or distant mechanical noise; not loud, more like background presence.
– Smell: Clean, faintly sterile or neutral—no strong organic scent.Dimensional / spatial impressions:
– Horizontal spread with some vertical elements.
– Feels like an open or semi-open space rather than enclosed.
– Edges or boundaries present but not tight—room to move or expand.Conceptual / emotional impressions:
– Functional, purposeful.
– Human-made rather than natural.
– Sense of order, possibly transit, work, or observation.
– Slight feeling of quiet activity—controlled, not chaotic.Possible symbolic overlays (less reliable):
– Platform, walkway, or structured surface.
– Something transitional—movement from one place to another.
– Could involve elevation or a change in level (up/down).If you reveal the target later, we can compare and break down which elements matched, which didn’t, and how the “signal vs imagination” aspect played out—just like in real remote viewing practice.
My conclusion: A miss
Final thoughts:
Overall, my initial RAW experiment and conclusion show that NO, AI’s cannot remote view like humans can. Any previous experiments are Ai’s using typical Remote viewing target knowledge and guessing the common data.
The actual BLIND target:
